On the DEWLine 2.0: Dwight Williams

Listening to this one at the moment:

https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/our-futurecestors-deserve-a-voice-in-today-s-decisions-says-author-1.5710902

Some of us have been discussing this proposal elsewhere, if memory serves:

https://bigthink.com/strange-maps/north-sea-dam

No, it's not going to be a panacea. It won't cure ills, but it will slow down some of the worsening consequences whilst deferring them to other places. And it will exact costs in other ways. The British Isles, however their borders are redrawn in the decades ahead, will still lose cities, towns, villages, farms, businesses...as will continental Europe outside the dams now containing/shielding/distorting the North Sea. Building this NEED project will be a consequence that creates consequences.

Building it will require the European Union to go from a coalition of nations to being a nation. If it hasn't already gotten there by the time the decision to build is taken.

With thanks to Col. Chris Hadfield, CF, CSA

https://twitter.com/Cmdr_Hadfield/status/285503660916617216/photo/1

In Canada, we get the likes of Conrad Black.

Again.

More when I get back from the movie theatre, on this and a few other things.

His continuing concerns are noted in many sympathetic quarters, despite the continuing effort to obfuscate them and otherwise degrade the general signal/noise ratio in the planet's political discussions.

Whether or not the professor takes any comfort in knowing this, though...?

james_nicoll just reported tremors in Kitchener-Waterloo at 1: 45 PM EST. About the same time as I was wrapping up my Ashcan Sampler 2010 page design work here at Patty's in the Market in Ottawa. Felt the tremors here too.

Anyone else?

Unnerving news items:

CBC: Water not recognized as a human right - from a conference connected to World Water Day.

The Tyee: Spiritual Capital - What's in it for Harper? - Apparently, there's some thinkers out there convinced that persuading people to fear Hell is going to help the corporate and national bottom line.

First off, how about that snowstorm? And the transit strike starting the very next day? I can't help but wonder if maybe After listening to Gwynne Dyer last night at St. Brigid's Centre for the Arts before heading out into the Bad Weather before the Labour Storm hasn't soured me a little on having sympathy for both sides of this.

Because there's a third side involved here, and that's the side keeping this planet as liveable for ourselves as possible for as long as possible. And hopefully keeping ourselves sane while we're working on all the crap we've gotten ourselves into as a species. That latest book of his, Climate Wars is a bit of an eye-opener. Or "re-opener". Or maybe I should rip off Mr. Dyer's editor at Embassy and use the same label he did: "shit disturber".

Why not? It works, impolite as it is. And my discomfort with the phrase matters not a whit nor a damn.

I am beginning to think that this particular labour battle is a waste of time for both City Hall and the Amalgamated Transit Union's Ottawa local. Both camps are missing the point I referred to last paragraph, that point about the third side. We've got a ticking clock here, and one we can possibly still have some small hope of stopping before it reaches "midnight": a 2-degree rise in worldwide temperatures due to carbon particulate pollution. Whether or not we'll be able to cheat that clock, and Mr. Dyer suggested ways and means of doing that with an eye towards using that extra time to actually solve this problem and maybe another one coming on its own anyway no matter how much ecological harm we do over the next century...well, we don't know for sure yet.

But the sooner we get this transit labour dispute settled, that'll be one less fight we need to have and one more bit of climate derangement solving done.

Cut a deal, people.

Sidebar: If you want to hear what Dyer actually said, go here. It'll have links to all the needed files.