Date: 2013-07-05 05:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] james-nicoll.livejournal.com
But what of Peak Wind? Oh, how you will all lament when the air runs out.

Date: 2013-07-05 05:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewline.livejournal.com
At the risk of being the straight man in someone else's joke: is such a thing even seriously foreseeable in anyone's lifetime right now?

Date: 2013-07-05 06:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] neowolf2.livejournal.com
This idea has been around for decades. There must be a reason it has never caught on. Excessive structural cost, water usage, high voltage arcing, and inefficiency of downshifting the high voltage output all seem like they would be problems.

Date: 2013-07-05 06:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewline.livejournal.com
Well, someone made some progress somewhere or the idea wouldn't be making a comeback now.

Date: 2013-07-06 10:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] neowolf2.livejournal.com
Well, frm what I can see, the design they have will suffer from corona discharge. Also, if there is no collector surface, charges will accumulate on nearby objects. This could be hazardous if used in populated areas.

I suspect rain, dust or fog would also discharge their system. It might function as a fog collector!

Maybe the best use would be at sea.

The original idea of electrostatic collection of wind energy dates back to the 1960s and 1970s, with a fellow named Marks having important patents in 1977.
Edited Date: 2013-07-06 10:15 am (UTC)

But what about the birds?

Date: 2013-07-05 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ed-rex.livejournal.com
If it's not going to kill our Winged Foes, what the hell's the point?

Profile

dewline: Text - "On the DEWLine" (Default)
On the DEWLine 2.0: Dwight Williams

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123 4567
8 9 1011 121314
15 16171819 20 21
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 25th, 2025 02:10 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios