dewline: Text: Searching and Researching (researching)
[personal profile] dewline
Yes, we're hitting the eight-billion mark in living humans this week. When I was starting grade school, I think we were at four billion.

Now, though, we have some debate over how difficult things are expected to become, how quickly, and in what ways exactly.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/8-billion-global-population-1.6646018

Date: 2022-11-15 03:26 pm (UTC)
mellowtigger: (pikachu magnifying glass)
From: [personal profile] mellowtigger
I agree that this is the last high population marker that we'll cross, but I think the SARS-CoV-2 will be responsible for decreases. I notice on that article's chart that growth took a noticeable change after 2019. Part of it may have been behavioral (stressful changes leading to lower birth rates during uncertainty), but I suspect that excess deaths are also already involved. I claim that it will accelerate as younger people start dying, never reaching an age of procreation.

Date: 2022-11-15 11:14 pm (UTC)
sabotabby: (doom doom doom)
From: [personal profile] sabotabby
Agreed. Add to this lower fertility rates and, on the good side, better access to birth control.

But mainly covid and the various other viruses, air pollution, floods, hurricanes, droughts, and climate-change-induced war, and I don't think overpopulation is going to be a problem.

What will be a problem is an aging population (though this is overestimated due to falling life expectancy) with not enough young people to support elders. Most of these young people will have worse health outcomes and may not be in a position to work or act as caregivers.

Profile

dewline: Text - "On the DEWLine" (Default)
On the DEWLine 2.0: Dwight Williams

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 2nd, 2026 07:47 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios