dewline: Text - "On the DEWLine" (Default)
[personal profile] dewline
I am annoyed by Jim Shaw, CEO of Shaw Communications, over something that he's threatening to do to the Canadian Television Fund unless CBC is further starved of funding - via CTF specifically - posthaste.

Mr. Shaw, please cease and desist in this behaviour. Shaw Communications, as far as I can tell, is doing quite nicely as it is. CBC's survival and current levels of funding does not hurt your company irreparably. Your employees are capable of keeping the corporate ship afloat without you making such noises as these. And as a Canadian citizen, a friend to assorted customers of yours, and a CBC viewer and listener, I wish that private broadcasters would kindly fall silent on the subject of the CBC. Their complaints over the fact of its continued existence annoy me. Especially when it succeeds at doing the work that the Broadcasting Act of Canada requires of it.

lets just spend....

Date: 2007-01-16 04:56 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
"Let's just spend all that money on more crappy U.S. productions rather than, oh, say, KEEPING IT IN OUR OWN COUNTRY!"

i'm not sure what you mean. as far as I can tell this fund is only for canadian productions. anyway, why should private business be forced to "contribute" to a fund?. is that not really just an extra tax?. if this is really for the canadian viewers benefit, then why not collect that in the form of a tax to all VIEWERS instead. maybe a levy on TV's ( like blank CDs ) or somthing. i know that won't happen (public pressure & or current gov on tax reduction ), so just get it from those big greedy companies instead.

In response...

Date: 2007-01-16 07:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewline.livejournal.com
...I can only say that the whole idea of trying to rebalance the playing field to ensure that our own products and creative talent can earn an honest living without having to move to Hollywood or Europe is one that appeals to me.

So does cultural sovereignty within our own borders.

As for a license fee - or even a onetime "first purchase" levy - for every TV, personal video recorder, etc. sold, it's certainly an idea worth considering.

I do consider the airwaves a public resource, though, strictly on loan to the networks. If they want access to what is still effectively a federal license to print money, then certain responsibilities - taxes if you need to call them that - obtain along with the desired privileges. And as a private citizen, I don't think the private networks have been delivering on their responsibilities.

Re: lets just spend....

Date: 2007-01-17 06:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] runesmith.livejournal.com
i'm not sure what you mean. as far as I can tell this fund is only for canadian productions.

I mean that Shaw would rather spend all of his money cherry-picking top ten U.S. network shows that will make guarenteed millions for his company in advertising revenue, instead of contributing a fraction of those millions towards Canadian productions that employ Canadians and promote Canadian culture.

I mean that he contributes nothing and creates nothing - he's just a merchant.

I was halfway through writing something lengthy on this subject, but [livejournal.com profile] dewline already covered a lot of it, and the rest I think I'll save for my blog (http://runesmith.blogspot.com). Not now, but maybe by the weekend. Stay tuned.

Profile

dewline: Text - "On the DEWLine" (Default)
On the DEWLine 2.0: Dwight Williams

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 2nd, 2026 04:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios