A question of social cohesion
Jan. 2nd, 2013 08:04 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I read an essay of note by Michael Valpy in the Toronto Star Op-Ed pages on the subject of social cohesion and how it might be affected by a national head of government determined to go against the social tide of the nation at whatever costs they deem fit.
Opinions, in support and in dissent, would be of interest.
Opinions, in support and in dissent, would be of interest.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 03:42 am (UTC)This explains it in a nutshell. Harper knows it, and it is exactly these divisions that he is doing his utmost to cultivate to keep things that way.
no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-03 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-04 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-04 01:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-01-05 07:57 am (UTC)As a philosophical conservative (but not a neo-Conservative), Harper's undemocratic acts have been both infuriating and dishonorable.
I've been worried about this country for a while ... and this OpEd article just makes it worse. :-(
Very much agreed that the failure to vote is part of why Harper is succeeding; however, I doubt that it is the complete story here. IMNSHO, other factors, such as ressentiment (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ressentiment) and regional anger over the domination of the center [Ontario and/or Quebec], also are coming to the fore.