<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dw="https://www.dreamwidth.org">
  <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2016-12-28:2649088</id>
  <title>On the DEWLine 2.0: Dwight Williams</title>
  <subtitle>On the DEWLine 2.0: Dwight Williams</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>On the DEWLine 2.0: Dwight Williams</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dewline.dreamwidth.org/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://dewline.dreamwidth.org/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2023-04-28T02:14:51Z</updated>
  <dw:journal username="dewline" type="personal"/>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2016-12-28:2649088:1936472</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dewline.dreamwidth.org/1936472.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://dewline.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=1936472"/>
    <title>Trek: About Commodores?</title>
    <published>2023-04-28T02:14:51Z</published>
    <updated>2023-04-28T02:14:51Z</updated>
    <category term="star trek"/>
    <category term="trivia"/>
    <category term="debate"/>
    <category term="opinion"/>
    <category term="starfleet"/>
    <dw:mood>curious</dw:mood>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>2</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">A theory about commodores c. 2401: Geordi, Beverly and Oh/Nedar are/were *regional* directors for their respective departments: History and Heritage (AKA the Fleet Museum), Medical Corps and Intelligence. They are *not* heads-of-department.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=dewline&amp;ditemid=1936472" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2016-12-28:2649088:1530502</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dewline.dreamwidth.org/1530502.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://dewline.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=1530502"/>
    <title>SKETCH: A Random Starfleeter and the Original Question</title>
    <published>2020-07-09T00:51:28Z</published>
    <updated>2020-07-09T00:51:28Z</updated>
    <category term="illustration"/>
    <category term="star trek"/>
    <category term="fan art"/>
    <category term="sketchbooks"/>
    <category term="dc comics"/>
    <category term="question"/>
    <category term="practice"/>
    <category term="starfleet"/>
    <category term="clip studio paint"/>
    <category term="dc universe"/>
    <category term="art"/>
    <dw:mood>busy</dw:mood>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>7</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">A work in progress, clearly.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a data-flickr-embed="true" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/dwight_ew/50091615558" title="Starfleeter and the Original Question"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/50091615558_cbacaa5fbf_c.jpg" width="800" height="566" alt="Starfleeter and the Original Question"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=dewline&amp;ditemid=1530502" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2016-12-28:2649088:1229052</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dewline.dreamwidth.org/1229052.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://dewline.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=1229052"/>
    <title>TREK: Constitution Class - Older Than We've Thought?</title>
    <published>2019-02-09T02:46:34Z</published>
    <updated>2019-04-15T18:53:59Z</updated>
    <category term="names"/>
    <category term="fiction"/>
    <category term="opinion"/>
    <category term="science fiction"/>
    <category term="starfleet"/>
    <category term="starships"/>
    <category term="history"/>
    <category term="ideas"/>
    <category term="treknology"/>
    <category term="star trek"/>
    <category term="continuity"/>
    <category term="theory"/>
    <category term="debate"/>
    <dw:mood>nerdy</dw:mood>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>2</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">Okay, I've had this idea percolating in the Trekkish corners of my brain for a little while. I'm sharing it now before this grind/whine noise in the right ear distracts me completely: the &lt;i&gt;Constitution&lt;/i&gt; class of starships has been in service since at least two decades before &lt;i&gt;Enterprise NCC-1701&lt;/i&gt; was commissioned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You want evidence. That's good. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What I have is the confirmed - in the episodes and movies as shown on TV and in the cinema and via subscription-streaming - registry numbers of the Federation starships we know for certain to be of that class. &lt;a href="https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Constitution_class"&gt;I'm sourcing this from Memory Alpha...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NCC-956 USS Eagle&lt;br /&gt;NCC-1017 USS Constellation&lt;br /&gt;NCC-1631 USS Intrepid&lt;br /&gt;NCC-1659 USS Potemkin&lt;br /&gt;NCC-1664 USS Excalibur&lt;br /&gt;NCC-1672 USS Exeter&lt;br /&gt;NCC-1700 (Unknown)&lt;br /&gt;NCC-1701 USS Enterprise&lt;br /&gt;NCC-1703 USS Hood&lt;br /&gt;NCC-1707 (Unknown)&lt;br /&gt;NCC-1709 USS Lexington&lt;br /&gt;NCC-1764 USS Defiant&lt;br /&gt;NCC-1856 USS Emden&lt;br /&gt;NCC-1895 USS Endeavour&lt;br /&gt;NCC-2014 USS Korolev&lt;br /&gt;NCC-2048 USS Ahwahnee&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I discount &lt;a href="http://trekplace.com/article10.html"&gt;Greg Jein's theory - "The Case of Jonathan Doe Starship" - that all starships docked at Starbase 10 during Kirk's court-martial re: the death of Benjamin Finney were &lt;i&gt;Constitution&lt;/i&gt;-class.&lt;/a&gt; The odds of such a happenstance are too small for me to consider. And thanks to &lt;b&gt;Star Trek: Discovery&lt;/b&gt; in general and the work of designer John Eaves in particular, we now have other options for the registries listed there.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I also prefer to assume - based on over 50 years' worth of evidence from the various series - that Federation Starfleet ship registry numbers are issued on a chronological basis, without interruption.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Up until now, I chose to believe that (1) the &lt;i&gt;Constitution&lt;/i&gt; herself was NCC-1700, and that all ships with registry numbers prior to hers were salvaged from previous starship classes. No longer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It may still well be that NCC-1700 belongs to &lt;i&gt;&lt;u&gt;a&lt;/u&gt; Starship Constitution&lt;/i&gt;...but she need not be either the first of her name or of her starship class. Not with six other starships of the class commissioned before her. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Kirk's claim of "twelve like her in the fleet"? Depends on your point of view. Going by registry numbers as confirmed, I'm willing to hazard a guess of at least three, perhaps as many as five production batches of ships. Kirk's twelve ships would certainly count as one of those three to five batches.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A lot of us have some investment in the mythology as established before DSC. I certainly did. I bought books and deck plan sets and stuff - not all of it officially licensed, but that's okay, because multiversal theory allows us to keep enjoying what we've bought as if it were official in some other version of Starfleet, somewhere in that multiverse.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anyway, there it is. I think I wrote it out coherently enough. Fellow Treknology fans are welcome to debate whatever parts they like.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=dewline&amp;ditemid=1229052" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2016-12-28:2649088:1227081</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dewline.dreamwidth.org/1227081.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://dewline.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=1227081"/>
    <title>TREK + MAPS: "Point of Light"</title>
    <published>2019-02-02T20:58:47Z</published>
    <updated>2019-02-02T20:59:43Z</updated>
    <category term="milky way galaxy"/>
    <category term="star trek: discovery"/>
    <category term="star trek"/>
    <category term="graphic design"/>
    <category term="starfleet"/>
    <category term="maps"/>
    <dw:mood>nerdy</dw:mood>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;img width="600" vspace="2" border="2" align="left" hspace="2" height="339" src="https://dewline.dreamwidth.org/file/200x200/3241.jpg" alt="" /&gt;Okay, this &lt;em&gt;is &lt;/em&gt;the map I&amp;nbsp;thought I&amp;nbsp;saw in the first act of &amp;quot;Point of Light&amp;quot;. I&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;want&lt;/em&gt; to say those are Federation Outposts Delta-4 through Delta-8 along the UFP-Klingon border per &lt;strong&gt;Star Charts&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;Stellar Cartography&lt;/strong&gt;...?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=dewline&amp;ditemid=1227081" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2016-12-28:2649088:1222005</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dewline.dreamwidth.org/1222005.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://dewline.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=1222005"/>
    <title>Helicarrier and Starship Design Factor Nerdery</title>
    <published>2019-01-20T22:43:44Z</published>
    <updated>2019-01-20T22:43:44Z</updated>
    <category term="treknology"/>
    <category term="s.h.i.e.l.d."/>
    <category term="infrastructure"/>
    <category term="militaria"/>
    <category term="starfleet"/>
    <category term="opinion"/>
    <category term="design"/>
    <category term="spacecraft"/>
    <category term="technology"/>
    <dw:mood>nerdy</dw:mood>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/navy-aircraft-carrier-gerald-ford-has-first-weapons-elevator-installed-2019-1"&gt;https://www.businessinsider.com/navy-aircraft-carrier-gerald-ford-has-first-weapons-elevator-installed-2019-1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From 2017, and I suspect the issues as described in this second article have since been fixed. It's been over a year and a half since publication, after all...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/us-navy-gerald-r-ford-aircraft-carrier-doesnt-have-urinals-2017-7"&gt;https://www.businessinsider.com/us-navy-gerald-r-ford-aircraft-carrier-doesnt-have-urinals-2017-7&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These articles are &lt;i&gt;gold&lt;/i&gt; for a SHIELD-Bearer or a Trekker of a certain kind...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=dewline&amp;ditemid=1222005" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
